Farrah Trickhart contacted me to say that I have irreparably damaged her reputation with my last blog post by including a shockingly deceitful and salacious allegation.
Farrah insists she is NOT 38 years old.
It must be noted that this is the only portion of my previous post to which Farrah objected. I have determined there are several possible explanations:
A - Farrah did not read the entire blog
B - Farrah is not an "active" reader
C - The voracity of every other fact on that post was irrefutable
B - Farrah is not an "active" reader
C - The voracity of every other fact on that post was irrefutable
D - Farrah doth protest too littleth!
Regardless, I want my readers to know that I understand the special status that has been accorded me as a member of the press and I accept that I have an ethical and moral obligation to uphold the public trust.
For this reason I would like to go on record to correct my previous entry by posting this retraction.
Upon reflection it does seem absurd that any reader would have believed Farrah to be 38 years old. I am indebted to Farrah for courageously pointing out this error before it went on to taint the voracity of the entire story.
- C Smith.
No comments:
Post a Comment